This is the way the web dies
This news story is easily one of the scariest things I've read recently, and the ramifications could be large indeed. From Norway...
OSLO, Norway -- Norway's supreme court ruled Thursday that a student whose Napster.no homepage was linked to free Internet music files must compensate the music industry. The country's highest court upheld a lower court ruling that ordered the student to pay $15,900 in compensation.
The student was learning computer engineering in the southern Norway town of Lillehammer when he set up the Napster.no site as part of a school project in 2001. His site had nothing do with the widely known Napster.com music site in the United States.
The Napster.no site provided links to music files in the MP3 format that could be downloaded for free. The site was online between August and November 2001, and provided links to about 170 free music files on servers outside Norway, the ruling said.
A lower court found for the music industry, while on appeal the Lagmannsetten court in Oslo cleared the student, saying any copyright violation occurred when others posted the music and not when he provided links to it. In a summary of its ruling, the supreme court said the music was clearly published in violation of copyright law.
"The supreme court decided the case based on responsibility for abetting (an illegal act)," the summary said. It said the student violated the law by showing people where to find the illegal music and that his actions "were premeditated and worthy of criticism."
Really think about this one, and what it leads to, and where it already is. The person wasn't hosting the MP3s in question, nor had he had any hand in making them, he was simply linking to where the files were on the internet and is being held responsible for them. What this means is that even telling someone something has become a civil offense, and the way things are, if the number is high enough it becomes a federal offense.
This means that if I link to MTKA and tell you that someone messaged me the other day saying that iLife '05 was on it within a few days of being announced several times (I'm told the mods kept taking it down, at least before it was released) I am theoretically guilty of abetting a crime if you go, find it, and haven't paid for it. I wish I was kidding, this shite is scary.
Anyone who has spent a bit of time with me knows I'm not pro-piracy in any shape or form, and don't have a MTKA account (Apple can feel free to check my IP) but simply telling you something is 'wrong'. What if I link to a story in Wired, which happens to tell you about a Swedish BitTorrent site that allows you to get just about any album or movie you'd want?
What if I tell you that yes, indeed you might be able to flash your new USA computer's DVD drive to play the DVDs you brought back from Australia? What if I tell you that if you have Windows and download Kaaza you can probably find just about anything you want. What if I tell you that a lot of college students use something called DirectConnect to shares files on their dorm networks?
What if I tell you that if you order something online from a company that isn't in your state, they don't charge you sales tax even though you're supposed to report it and pay it yourself? What if I tell you that lots of art students like to smoke a little marijuana from time to time, and if you go to a certain theatre in Chicago you can generally find whatever you're after?
What if I tell you anything?
When I talk to you, my vocal chords shape the air from my lungs, which is further shaped by my tongue and lips. The vibrations travel through the air, tickle your ear drum and are interpreted by your brain as... speech. At it's base form, it's information. I'm telling you something, and imparting information. When I link to something, I do the same thing.
A hyperlink is basic information. That's it. It's taking a few words, which are information, and wrapping them in a little more information. The only real difference between 'speech' is in the sensory organ being used, or medium.
This is the way the web dies. Not with a bang but with a whimper.
Comments (7)
Posted by: Carl at January 29, 2005 02:13 AM
Well, this isn't really a new troubling development though. It's an old troubling development. Surely you heard about the trouble that 2600.com got into for linking to DeCSS way back in the day?
Posted by: Matthew Schinckel at January 29, 2005 03:26 AM
[light-hearted-mode]
And why buy DVDs in Australia and take them elsewhere? Everyone seems to buy DVDs elsewhere and bring them back to Australia.
[/light-hearted-mode]
I have been reading "The Hacker Crackdown" recently, and in the US in 1990 they didn't prosecute, only confiscate equipment and information. And often (like with Steve Jackson Games) there was no real reason for the raid to begin with.
The biggest similarity was that the crackdown only occurred because Telcos pushed for it to happen...just like RIAA/MPAA is doing now.
Posted by: cjp at January 29, 2005 08:56 AM
Is it more of an offence because the person wrote the information down on a publicly accessible medium, rather than just conveying the information verbally? Does this mean the law in Norway now discriminates against deaf people?
Posted by: Bruce Hoult at January 29, 2005 06:20 PM
Interestingly, here in NZ any DVD player you buy will be region-free.
Either the salesman gives you a bit of paper with the instructions, or the URL for a web site with them, or does it himself before you leave the store, or did it when the player came into stock, or the importer did it.
It's always just a matter of pressing the right remote control buttons in the right order, not anything as hard as flashing the ROM. The manufacturers don't want to make five different models just for region coding any more than users want region coding.
Oh, I'm told that Sony may be an exception (own a movie studio). But I don't know as I like Pioneer stuff.
Posted by: iMan at January 30, 2005 03:43 PM
Yup... something to think of this...
You should probably know about this that the owner did in fact knew what he did was very dubious. Like the site was not just showing the links, but rather actively promoting to download free music that was obviously "pirated".
The law in Norway is that you are allowed to make copies of your music for close friends - and it is not clearly stated that it is illegal to download from the web. It is however illegal to make the content available. This is about to change however - a new paneuropean law is supposed to clear things up with both down- and uploading being illegal - only on copyrighted material though.
So, under the current law the ruling is understandable, but - as you point out - also questionable. Is this really how we want things... ? At least I feel the need for real clarifications regarding several things related to the "digital lifestyle"- Like; should you actually be allowed to put pictures you take of other people on the web just like that for example... also an issue here in Norway this winter, as a lot of blogs and nightclubs put up pictures of compromising images of other people (like in nude) and of guests. Then these sites are refferred in media, of course the hits go skyhigh - and suddenly the rather tacky picture of you pants around ankles, completely insanely drunk and getting arrested is all over the place... (btw: this is really not allowed, but sanctions and actions is not there to take care of it, so... but the refferring sites should also know this is illegal, and hence referencing to illegal material... well, you get the point...)
Posted by: jbelkin at January 30, 2005 07:35 PM
I wouldn't worry too much abot the Nordic countries - they have oddball ideas about individual freedoms - if It's not Norway, it's Finland where your income is availble for access by cops since you're fined by income ... so some guy in a Ferrari was fine like $75,000 for going 100 MPH (or whtaever it is in KPH) since he was a millionaire - all it will end up doing is increasing the business of countries where personal freedoms/privacy are either guaranteed or can be bought (like the Cayman's).
Norway will just lose out in the new world economy.








Dude, you are warping my brain lately. You raise good points but since when did you go activist? :) I guess if your name IS "drunkenbatman"