You can't wear your own swag
Many times, things that have built up into a craft are viewed as inaccessible magic to those who don't a background in them. People will look at programmers or architects or designers as though they're practicing voodoo, when in reality they're often taking very simple concepts and scaling them up.
Once you grasp those concepts, getting to a certain level is primarily about building your knowledge base and gaining experience. Talent very much plays a role, but talent in its base form is being able to intuitively grasp certain concepts almost unconsciously. It doesn't mean you'll be adept, but chances are you'll at least have an appreciation for what you're seeing.
There are some concepts in public relations and marketing that are, well, some of the foundations of how public relations and marketing actually work. These aren't terribly hard to grasp, rather they're innate concepts we use every day... just scaled up.
One of these ideas is that a person is much more likely to reinforce an idea handed to them than they are to add information to it. Another is that people really do respond to the tone in which things are presented, and are more likely than not to respond in kind.
We all have a pool of cross-referenced data in the back of our heads that we draw on when having a conversation. If someone comes up to us and says, "OMG I'm so excited I get to go to Tahiti for two weeks on vacation and see my grandmother!", chances are you won't go "I hate my grandmother, grandmothers are the worst family members ever. Plus Tahiti has those really big spiders. I hate traveling." but rather you'll sample from the back of your brain and pull things out that are consistent with the subject being presented as well as the tone in which it's presented.
Depending on your frame of reference, the data might be different between different people. You might have data to pull from the back of your brain in areas of grandmothers, vacations, Tahiti, etc. Whatever the subject, you will have a strong disposition to sampling out good things about those areas to add to the conversation, rather than negative in order to match the tone of the person initiating the conversation. The reverse would be true if someone approached you in a negative way.
At it's core this is what PR and marketing are all about, even though you probably experience these concepts day to day, or variants of them... they're just scaled up a bit.
There's a reason why I'm bringing this up; too often lately I've been watching people forget that at it's heart, public relations and PR are inherently social things. They aren't a one-way street, and while you can try to create a meme, or viral idea, throwing them out in a one-way direction is risking a heavy backfire. If you're curious about exactly who I'm talking about, some of the recent posts might give you an indication.
These 'ideas', or press releases, are specifically formulated to set a specific tone; to 'frame the conversation'. But there can be a certain hubris in assuming that just because you say it, it'll get picked up by the hive mind. It can often frame things in a negative way which actually comes back to you. It might be worth noting that before a certain press release, a certain company had virtually no mindshare in the digital music market at all, and is being viewed by many as a rival.
It's also worth noting that a certain company recently had banners at it's developer conference proclaiming things like "Redmond, start your photocopiers" and the like, which was so obvious and full of so many holes, especially with some of the controversies that came out of the conference... that's it's being used against them as more of a joke now than anything else, and even real mac-heads basically just chuckled and move on... realizing that someone was trying really, really hard to push the idea that when Microsoft's OS hits it'll mostly be copied functionality from Apple.
This is basically the crux of the matter; trying too hard to push a meme, and having it backfire. These aren't the only recent cases, they're just the ones I'm isolating. And I'm sure you've been exposed to many in your own experiences. Chances are you've known someone who has gone out of his/her way to say nothing but bad things about someone, and then when you meet the person you they aren't what they were made out to be. This generally shifts everything in your head regarding the situation, and causes you to question the credibility of the person feeding you the dirt.
When you're perceived as trying too hard to push an idea, you're setting yourself up to not only have your credibility questioned but to have the whole mindshare situation change. People can not only start questioning the idea you're trying to push, but a larger share of them becomes unwilling to further the idea and add to it. Simple as that. The hard part is saying recognizing that arbitrary tipping point where you're crossing the line.
A good analogy of this involves music bands. Self-promotion is at the core of a small band, and there's absolutely nothing uncool about a band doing everything they can to 'get their message out'. There is nothing wrong with selling t-shirts at a gig, or walking around laying down fliers every place they can.
But they can't wear their own t-shirts. Ever. They can sell their swag anywhere they like, and ask people to buy it, but if someone from a band is photographed wearing their own swag, or even worse, actually goes up on stage and performs while wearing it... it kills something and sets them up for a backlash.
In it's simplest form, it's very cool if others are wearing DrunkenBlog swag, but if i were ever caught wearing it I'd be trying too hard and something would be lost. Even if my 13 loyal readers would be too kind to actually tell me I'd jumped the shark.
The real idea to take from this is that one doesn't really own their reputation or mindshare, they're the object of it. They can guide it or alter its course, but those who forget the relations part of 'public relations' and instead treat it as a one-way street of banging ideas into their users' heads are asking for it.
Comments (18)
Posted by: Steve at August 15, 2004 09:52 AM
I have worked at two major software companies helping to coordinate user interface design. From my viewpoint, Apple's PR hubris about somebody in Redmond firing up a copier does not seem to be all that inappropriate at all. Its a question of context.
Drunkenblog, if you want to see hyped up PR based on *fluff* in our industry, I think Apple is an unfair target. Unfair because while they may not be a great business with their erratic movements and management, in the context of ui and software creativity they deserve all the hype and PR in the world.
I am saying this because other major software companies I had experience with constantly, constantly said that they are all about innovation and in reality, in my experience, they were all about *shipping* software. Shipping functional software that does its job is good business, but I get frustrated when their hype and PR says its all about innovation, when in reality high level management was minimally concerned about that and much more geared towards execution and getting the product out the door. This shows in the software. Things don't fit, are not thought through. The ui doesn't flow.
If you want to see innovation in the ui space look at OS X, look at Safari, look at the i-pod and the Powerbook. THAT is innovation, not just hype. The proof, as they say is in the pudding and at least Apple provides something that tastes very decent.
So, in that context Apple's PR hubris doesn't seem to me to be without justification.
Posted by: Perry at August 15, 2004 02:58 PM
I think I get it. In politics if you name your opponent or go or attack them you can be attacked for the same thing. Much better to plant the idea generally and let others say it?
Apple has been made fun of for those banners. The Gentoo Linux guys have poked fun and the Konfab group to name two. I think it will get worse now if Longhorn has things Apple does not have.
Posted by: fitz at August 15, 2004 03:06 PM
I was reading about Apple versus Real in Time Magazine! They had two logos battling. Amazing when you think about how little share Real has.
The media loves a horse race and Apple gave it to them.
Posted by: Petter Jensen at August 15, 2004 05:05 PM
The big thinker in my company (brand managment) is always talking about how you can't own the "brand" itself - the real value of the brand exists only in the heads of the public (or more specific your target group) - if you're good (and lucky) they have a good perception of you.
You analogies are more than accurate the way I look upon these things. The difficult part for Apple now is in regards of this music/content business, they are suddenly finding themselves as the marketleader. That needs a new approach altogether for marketing/PR - suddenly you find yourself the target of everyone (ie. the Real case) - there is vastly less room for errors, and a lot easier to get people ticked off for what you do and say. For Apple being the outsider as in the OS business they can take a slightly more direct and ironic approach - as the marketleader they absolutely need to keep the path clean and level themselves above the competition; i.e. not even vaguely reference the competitors in any way.
I completely agree that Apple should be real careful from now on hopefully they will adapt - and focus on delivering us great products :)
Posted by: mennonot at August 15, 2004 05:24 PM
I think the logical extension of the branding argument is can you create an anti-brand as the folks at black spot sneaker (http://www.blackspotsneaker.org/) are trying to do.
In some ways, I think they are trying to reclaim some of the two way aspects of PR work, which a lot of massive corporations have lost (perhaps partly as a result of sheer scale).
A large component of the blackspot website is e-mails from participants with their own ideas of ways to innovate. Perhaps the step beyond traditional PR is to put a meme out on the marketplace and really let it evolve. To let the meme shape you and not just the other way around.
Posted by: Pene at August 15, 2004 05:25 PM
What is swag and where do you purchase
Posted by: Paul at August 15, 2004 05:32 PM
Steve,
I believe the point is that whether it is true or not it is better to plant the seed and have others saying it but not Apple themselves. I have seen this. When Apple says it, they look like they are trying too hard and they get a backlash.
I can see how that press release hurt Apple and made Real their rival, but it would have been hard to do it differently.
Paul
Posted by: ssp at August 15, 2004 06:23 PM
What happens outside the world of PR? The same thing may be at work as well... the other way round:
I can ask myself how much 'hype' my own ideas deserve, how much effort I should make to promote them, to which extent they are worth bothering other people for.
One of the big things of PR seems to be that people who do it need to be absolutely convinced that whatever (crap) they're doing is actually worth bothering people for. Unlike real people they don't even consider the possibility that they might just be wasting people's time.
I'm not a PR type, I may even be an anti-PR type. But I can wear my own shirts without ruining my credibility ;)
Posted by: Jim Whiteacker at August 15, 2004 09:00 PM
I'd wear a DrunkenBlog t-shirt!
Posted by: M at August 15, 2004 10:42 PM
Er, Steve
A) He didn't say anything about whether Apple deserved to be hyped, just that the way they went about it was strategically unsound. To which I would add, it was also tacky.
B) OS X? Safari? O.K. nice compared to the junk out there on PCs, but as a long time Mac user I can't help but notice that, as I've been saying all along, the Aqua appearance (what 4 years into this thing) looks ugly, childish, and watery; the Aqua user interface is the kind of uncoordinated junk heap of disparated parts people used Macs to avoid; and OS X's feature set feels more than a little antiquated too. Maybe it's just me, but I wouldn't have waited four or five years to integrate search and sync.
And as some one who has used web browsers for some years and feels a desperate need at present for one I'd like to use, if the developers of Safari, Firefox, and Camino didn't miss the memo that Mosaic died, then what is with those tired old retreads? Fine you all have very nice rendering engines, shame none of you have a good browser to put them in.
Posted by: PeZ at August 16, 2004 03:23 AM
:: Pene asked
:: What is swag and where do you purchase
This is the definition I found of swag:
Promotional merchandise for a band, record label, or other entity in the music business, usually distributed at concerts.
May include t-shirts, stickers, promo CDs, posters, etc. Often free, but not necessarily; a t-shirt or record purchased at a concert might still be considered swag, especially if it is a design or release that is not readily available in the mass market.
Many independent record labels throw in a handful of free swag when they ship out mail-order packages (stickers, sampler CDs, etc).
The chief difference between swag and regular merchandise is that its purpose is not to make a profit, but to promote the band/label, and reward its supporters by giving them something cool and unique.
For purchasing drunken blog swag I don't know, first I have heard of it too.
Posted by: solios at August 16, 2004 02:32 PM
O_o
I think a lot of replies kind of missed the point. :P
Imo, Apple doing the Real bit was an attempt to put a negative / WTF spin on the situation, and the "Photocopiers" bit was... well.... shit. Pot, Kettle, Black. Back in the System Seven days, maybe. But now? After Apple's copied a lot of oldskool Windows functionality into their own user interface? (the 10.3 functioning of Alt-Tab is pretty Obvious, nevermind the spiritual similarities between Classic and DOS Compataiblity Mode).
Bottom line, Apples marketing has made my nads cringe ever since they dropped Think Different and started the "Switch" thing. :P
Posted by: losof at August 17, 2004 09:28 AM
Real vs Apple is a farce and a major PR desaster, so true.
In reality its more like ASUS vs Apple and even Dell vs Apple i feel (their Deal with HP just undelines that situation for me), because those are the companies that imitate (not copy) Apple products (i-/powerbook) down to the power button of theirs.
The only reason I can think of why Apple doesn't have 15% of the notebook market at the time of writing are their rumoured and true technical problems, theese systems are sold by word of mouth, you have to know someone you trust. The cost problem can be solved, as an entry-level ibook is (relatively) affordable, especially if you consider how much more you can do with it. Too bad my conversation skills are so badly i can hardly lay out my point and that this is so far from the original point.
As far as i've read from 3rd party sources Microsoft is really out to innovate in Longhorn, to have the more consequent adaption of a 3d desktop (vectored icons!), and WinFS is actually a concept i have dreamed of for years. No question that they will screw that up as they did with just about anything (but .net) in the past, but the technology will be as influent as .net, just by its existence. If i understood only a tiny percent of what c# is about it is an almost as effective archivement, but .net got all the media coverage (plus open source implementation). I am afraid that over-gadgetted Searchlight is made with a hot needle, a tiny leaf to cover that WinFS 'surperiority by concept' (something Apple/Next/BeOS/Atari/Acorn/Amiga had a monopoly on for years) flaw up, the /only/ option i could think up for Apple to go would to meet the open source community plus some other proprietary and big players and to design a new file storage standard. But that again would not only require commitment and a dedication/will to communicate not yet seen in history of Apple Inc., Cupertino (it is one (great!) idea to provide (great!) developer docs, but another to open up your fields to possible competitors, allowing the risk for them to get more harvest than you, or, even worse, to let the whole land fall into non-control/-ownership/anarchy), but also interfere with their DRM strategy, to have at least one way to maintain ownership over a portion of the file(s), even if it is only a soap bubble (and long term utopia) as of now.
Thus they're only playing the test balloon for MS. They ruin their fine products along the way but can be safe not to get into the shooting line of Redmond as they're the only ones to have a vital interest for Apple not to go out of business. In times of crisis (and crisis is a permanent state if you're in capitalism and not the dominator of your market the economists say) Apple always have prostituted themselves as Microsoft's pet.
On a footnote I don't care if it's Apple or Microsoft-compatible, as long as there is Linux i hardly have to worry about keeping ownership of my data thus I can take it wherever I want to go, and that is all that counts for me -- too bad Sue Mi (or John Doe) don't have enough knowledge to be able to do the same, but I'm too lazy to go out on the street to show them. ("Besides, i am part of the computer elite, why should I?" i hear some of you yawn...)
Please do not call me a pessimist, but the best way to promote the Ipod would be a Powerbook that works as an mp3 player with having that lid closed and bad free digital cameras (phones) work brilliantly as a demonstration why you need a digital camera in your life (may it be a phone with a better/at least sufficient one or /the real thing/). Remember that first free fix Dr.Pusherman gave you? You want it? Start it. Right now Apple does most of all start DRM, may it be by good intention or in spite off, all that matters is its effect. I love my vinyl lps. And I enjoy mp3s as a radio replacement, to find out about great music (credits for that go mostly the one-of-a-kind soulseek community for this, btw). Theese are happy times we're living in (for us, readers, here).
---
mennonot, isn't that what naomi klein's 'no logo' was about? that's-so-1998 :)
M, what is bad about Firefox on Windows? And about Safari the only thing i don't understand is why it doesn't include Sherlcok functionality where the search history resides. What do you mean by /death/ of Mosaic?
solios, 'Think Different' was a nice thing when the 'computer at all' was still a thing used by a minority, now that its business dominates the richest societies it would be self-crippeling, think of 'Switch' like 'Think Better', the essence of what 'Think Different' always wanted to say (look at that Einstein), the successfull computer of now doesn't have to be different (/i'm not that kind of stupid computer nerd like my neighbour, i'm different!/) (=i *want* to be better) anymore, it has got to work, we by now left the experimental state. look at this wonderful powerbook, it just works. and, as i've mentioned before i'd be happy to switch to anything, /not just the different/ if it would enable me to do what i want to do better.
Posted by: losof at August 17, 2004 09:34 AM
Drunkenbatman, look, my post is almost as long as yours! :P
Posted by: enigma at August 17, 2004 04:22 PM
"I hate my grandmother, grandmothers are the worst family members ever. Plus Tahiti has those really big spiders. I hate traveling."
umm... Tahiti has really big spiders? Damn glad I found that out before leaving...time to change some plans...
Posted by: Max at August 19, 2004 03:59 AM
I'd wear a drunkenblog shirt!
Posted by: Pete Prodoehl at August 19, 2004 01:25 PM
"But they can't wear their own t-shirts."
Classic... because it's true...








Macy Gray had her album release date on her dress during the MTV music awards in 2001. I liked her before I saw that.